Which of the following does NOT constitute a valid reason for license revocation?

Being deemed unfit by public reputation does not constitute a valid reason for license revocation because this determination is subjective and often based on perceptions rather than concrete evidence of misconduct or violation of laws. Licensing authorities typically require that revocations be based on clear, documented infractions or failure to comply with specific regulations tied to professional conduct.

In contrast, the other options represent tangible actions or violations that can be definitively substantiated. A violation of a building code, for instance, signifies a failure to adhere to established legal standards that ensure safety and compliance. Disregarding blueprints and specifications can lead to structural issues or safety hazards, making it a legitimate cause for revocation. Similarly, mishandling deposit money indicates a breach of trust and legal responsibility that directly impacts clients and stakeholders, warranting disciplinary action. These actions reflect clear infractions against regulatory requirements, making them valid reasons for license revocation.